Diese Zahl gab Falk Eisermann, Leiter des GW, in einer Diskussion in Exlibris bekannt:
The "only scholars" argument is also utterly wrong. You'd be surprised how many different people actually use these digital books for a variety of purposes, including reading them online. You'd also be surprised how many alleged experts in this field, "scholars", are not aware of the amount of material that can be accessed online (no less than about 30% of all recorded 15th-century editions, and new stuff is added as we speak. I don't think any single segment of printed books from any other period has a higher digitization rate.)
Zur Debatte:
https://listserv.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/wa-iub.exe?A2=ind1103&L=EXLIBRIS-L&T=0&F=&S=&P=58936
The "only scholars" argument is also utterly wrong. You'd be surprised how many different people actually use these digital books for a variety of purposes, including reading them online. You'd also be surprised how many alleged experts in this field, "scholars", are not aware of the amount of material that can be accessed online (no less than about 30% of all recorded 15th-century editions, and new stuff is added as we speak. I don't think any single segment of printed books from any other period has a higher digitization rate.)
Zur Debatte:
https://listserv.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/wa-iub.exe?A2=ind1103&L=EXLIBRIS-L&T=0&F=&S=&P=58936
KlausGraf - am Freitag, 11. März 2011, 19:06 - Rubrik: Digitale Bibliotheken
