http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/34/suppl_1/D527
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
This seems equivalent to Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (CC-BY-NC). Derivative works seems to be allowed. It seems also allowed to mirror the article in an academic OA repository.
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
This seems equivalent to Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (CC-BY-NC). Derivative works seems to be allowed. It seems also allowed to mirror the article in an academic OA repository.
KlausGraf - am Donnerstag, 13. April 2006, 04:26 - Rubrik: Open Access
Ladislaus meinte am 2006/04/13 17:31:
Doesn't seem equivalent to me. "the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given;" (Oxford). - I don't think that is the same as "Attribution. You must give the original author credit." (CC).
(see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/deed.en_GB )
KlausGraf antwortete am 2006/04/13 19:59:
Equivalent?
I disagree with you. Please read the full legal code:"If you distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices for the Work and provide, reasonable to the medium or means You are utilizing: (i) the name of Original Author (or pseudonym, if applicable) if supplied, and/or (ii) if the Original Author and/or Licensor designate another party or parties (e.g. a sponsor institute, publishing entity, journal) for attribution in Licensor's copyright notice, terms of service or by other reasonable means, the name of such party or parties; the title of the Work if supplied; to the extent reasonably practicable, the Uniform Resource Identifier, if any, that Licensor specifies to be associated with the Work, unless such URI does not refer to the copyright notice or licensing information for the Work; and in the case of a Derivative Work, a credit identifying the use of the Work in the Derivative Work (e.g., "French translation of the Work by Original Author," or "Screenplay based on original Work by Original Author"). Such credit may be implemented in any reasonable manner; provided, however, that in the case of a Derivative Work or Collective Work, at a minimum such credit will appear where any other comparable authorship credit appears and in a manner at least as prominent as such other comparable authorship credit." (my emphasis)
Ladislaus meinte am 2006/04/13 23:20:
if... then: 1) the name of such party or parties; 2) the title of the Work; 3) URI; 4) a credit identifying the use of the Work in the Derivative Work. but NOT: "with the correct citation details given". IMHO another illustration of the fact that the nightmare of red tape that comes with cc licenses (or, even worse, the GFDL) prevents them from being really easy-to-use. And, this said, another illustration of the fact that propietary are even worse...