Allgemeines
Architekturarchive
Archivbau
Archivbibliotheken
Archive in der Zukunft
Archive von unten
Archivgeschichte
Archivpaedagogik
Archivrecht
Archivsoftware
Ausbildungsfragen
Bestandserhaltung
Bewertung
Bibliothekswesen
Bildquellen
Datenschutz
... weitere
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren
null

 

English Corner

With the permission of the Society of American Archivists, the 1985 SAA manual Archives and Manuscripts: Law, which I wrote with my husband Gary, is now scanned and posted on my website http://www.trudypeterson.com under "Publications." The manual includes a model deed of gift and a model deposit agreement, a model general restriction statement, a sample loan agreement, and more. While the examples in the text are now out of date, the basic information is not. Gary and I hope you will find this online version useful.

Trudy Huskamp Peterson
Certified Archivist


From Archives-L

http://bcad.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-humble-paper-clip-friend-or-foe/

Although post-it notes have a low-tack adhesive and are designed to be removed without leaving a mark, over time the adhesive hardens. I removed a post-it note (1990 vintage) from a Christmas card Carl Giles had illustrated and it left a ‘gunge’. Luckily it was one of many duplicates but what if it had been the only copy or highly valuable? One option would have been to leave the post-it note attached and let the adhesive degrade over a longer period of time so that it would eventually dry out, allowing the post-it note to fall off. But it would still leave a stain. The same thing applies to sellotape, so remember that when you are taping torn pieces of paper back together. [...]

As post-it notes are a relatively new invention they are going to be found in greater quantities when material from the 1970s onwards get appraised to see if it is of archival value and needs to be kept. So, keep this in mind the next time you want to use our multi-coloured ‘friend’.

I wonder when the oldest post-it note still attached to a document was first used?



http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=109

Best Use of Web 2.0 Technologies

* Winner: “A View To Hugh: Processing the Hugh Morton Photographs and Films,” North Carolina Collection Photographic Archives, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
* Honorable Mention: The Library of Congress on Flickr, The Library of Congress.

Best Online Archival Exhibition

* Winner: “Publishers’ Bindings Online, 1815-1930: The Art of Books,” The University of Alabama, University Libraries and the University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries.
* Honorable Mention: “Crafting the Oregon Constitution,” Oregon State Archives.
* Honorable Mention: “Sounds and Stories: The Musical Life of Maryland’s African American Communities,” Archives of the Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University.

Best Total Web Experience

* Winner: The National Archives of the United Kingdom.
* Honorable Mention: Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution.
* Honorable Mention: The Wisconsin Historical Society.
* Honorable Mention: Archives Division, Ulster County Clerk, Ulster County, New York.

http://www.searchpigeon.org/

A Google Custom Search.

http://www.cinder.hk/LatinEdit/Overview.html

There is no Windows version, thus I cannot say anything about it.

http://digitalearchivaris.blogspot.com/2008/02/een-tweede-leven-voor-een-oude.html

The article on displaying archival maps in virtual worlds can be downloaded at:

http://www.box.net/shared/qzrico3oks

Serious articles on archival topics should be deposited in repositories like E-LIS!

By Jack Kessler

It is a starting-place for research, only, like any
encyclopedia... And it can be incomplete and uneven and
at-times-eccentric to the point of being quirky, although again
like any encyclopedia... It offers great "pictures"...

More importantly, though, Wikipédia is becoming the premier
research "starting-point", the first resort, on French subjects:
for students and researchers of all types, on both sides of the
Manche, both sides of the Atlantique, elsewhere -- just ask
them... Why? Because it is right there on the laptop or even on
the handheld: _that_ is "access"!

But what is the "quality" to be obtained thereby: the breadth,
the depth, the accuracy? Well, that is changing: all reference
resources change over time, but unlike the others Wikipédia is
changing very rapidly, and it seems always to be getting better.


A few Wikipédia examples:

* Jean Bodin -- This Wikipédia article currently offers several
concise screens' worth of information, on the 16th c. savant.

One learns, instantly and easily, who Bodin was and where he
"fits" -- that he was a contemporary of Montaigne and Nostradamus
-- that his ideas had something to do with "sovereignty", also
with "sorcery"... Instant links are provided, to other Wikipédia
articles on these topics, and to other websites, and famous
quotes and bibliography are included. It's all in French, but
links to similar -- perhaps done worse, perhaps done better --
are provided too, to other Wikipedia "Bodin" articles in 18 other
languages!

That last is extraordinary, I think: it reminds me of the old
"polyglot" bibles, which squeezed only 4 languages in.

So, if the professor, of law or politics or international
relations -- anywhere, including in France -- teased the class
today by announcing that next week's lecture will be about "Jean
Bodin", and if you can't remember much, or really have no idea...
Well, it's easy: out comes the omnipresent wifi-enabled laptop,
and this excellent Wikipédia starting-point conveniently appears.

No, don't "cite" Wikipédia in your thèse d'état... But then you
wouldn't cite a printed encyclopedia, either -- one which you
laboriously have dug out of a far-off library reading-room. Both
simply are research starting-points: one just happens to be a lot
more convenient, nowadays, and with its links far more supple,
than the other.


A second example:

* Révolution française -- The Senior Partner's spouse is on his
way to a tony Paris "cocktail"... He has texted you desperately
from his limo that his French is OK but he can't remember how
"The Mountain" figured in their revolution, or exactly what its
adherents were called, "and someone is sure to ask!"... He is an
insecure and anxious type, and She is not along this time to
reassure him...

The Wikipédia article on his topic, which he can reach and read
easily en route, on his own handheld, can advise him: "Quand les
_Montagnards_ arrivent au pouvoir, la République connaît des
périls extrèmes..." etc. -- and as "Montagnards" is linked he not
only learns the exact French term he sought but also he can point
& click to an article providing great detail about the group...
this to a limo crawling through Paris traffic... via an
intermediary -- you -- who might be located currently on a bus in
San Francisco, or beneath a tree in Tasmania...

It is a Brave New Information World... but at least Wikipédia is
here, to help the francophone part of it, anyway...


A few more instances:

* glaucome -- Linked from the article in English... the French
Wikipédia article not only provides the subtly-different French
spelling of the principal term, it also offers reminders of
ancillary terminology and faux amis -- "humeur aqueuse", "la
pression intra-oculaire", "corps ciliare" -- useful review for
one's own limo-, or maybe taxi-, ride to that professional
conference out at La Défense.

* Lyon -- Suppose it's a student paper on Roman Gaul... The
Wikipédia article: ah, "Lugdunum" -- link to an enormous detailed
article on the old Roman capital, rigorously annotated and
copiously linked. Sheer magic, those Internet links...
Illustrated, with full bibliography: the inquisitive student's
research dream.

* and, finally here, chaologie -- oops no, faux ami alert,
Wikipédia says that should be "chaos quantique" -- let's see...
Again, the Wikipédia article appears to be very complete: an
introduction, starting-point only, but who among us honestly can
say we'd need no such overview / introduction to such a subject,
particularly to its French aspects and terminology, if we were
asked to "report on" or "attend a conference regarding" same?

All this is introduced by a well-designed and interesting
homepage --

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accueil

-- which explains how the specifically-French Wikipedia site is
constructed, and offers characteristically-French resources for
plowing through it -- "portails thématiques", "image du jour", etc.


The general Wikipedia effort has developed into one of the
world's outstanding digital library resources. To date there are
over 2,218,000 articles in its version in English alone; plus
over 705,000 in German, 468,000 in Polish, 466,000 in Japanese,
410,000 in Italian -- and such Wikipedia versions are offered now
in over 250 languages.

The range of quality in the articles can be enormous: from very
bad to extremely good, again like other reference resources...
But in Wikipedia's case there is one outstanding difference: the
good articles can be really good, and the bad articles constantly
-- 24/7 in a continuous and truly-globalized effort -- are
getting better and better.

This last is a key to Wikipedia, as it is to so many online
digital library undertakings: change -- Wikipedia is dynamic,
constantly-changing -- this can be unsettling, to someone seeking
immutability, permanence, in their "authoritative" reference
resources -- but it is how Wikipedia grows, so rapidly and so
enormously, and it is how it gets better and better.

Other reference resources by comparison are immutable, literally:
they just stand there, still, until their next publication date,
which may be years away. That can be a good thing but also a bad
thing, just like Wikipedia's changeability...

To anyone interested in information science -- interested in
digital libraries -- perhaps the most fascinating aspect of the
Wikipedia effort is its tranparency: the minute history and
ongoing log of the design and development of each article may be
viewed by any registered member, on the article's "historique"
and "discussion" tab pages -- to register simply click the link
in the upper right corner of any page, "Créer un compte".

The Wikipedia in French -- "Wikipédia: l'encyclopédie libre" --

http://fr.wikipedia.org

-- currently offers over 621,459 articles, available from nearly
anywhere, 24/7, on your nearest laptop or iPhone, with nice
pictures and active links, plus links to same-topic articles in
nearly any language.


Jack Kessler, kessler@well.com

Sent from my iPhone -- The Future will be Handheld


--oOo--


FYI France (sm)(tm) e-journal ISSN 1071-5916

*
| FYI France (sm)(tm) is a monthly electronic
| journal published since 1992 as a small-scale,
| personal experiment, in the creation of large-
| scale "information overload", by Jack Kessler.
/ \ Any material written by me which appears in
----- FYI France may be copied and used by anyone for
// \\ any good purpose, so long as, a) they give me
--------- credit and show my email address, and, b) it
// \\ isn't going to make them money: if it is going
to make them money, they must get my permission
in advance, and share some of the money which they get with me.
Use of material written by others requires their permission. FYI
France archives may be found at http://www.cru.fr/listes/biblio-fr@cru.fr/
(BIBLIO-FR archive), or http://listserv.uh.edu/archives/pacs-l.html
(PACS-L archive), or http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/Collections/FYIFrance/
or http://www.fyifrance.com . Suggestions, reactions, criticisms,
praise, and poison-pen letters all gratefully received at kessler@well.sf.ca.us .

Copyright 1992- , by Jack Kessler,
all rights reserved except as indicated above.

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Historic_manuscript_%22The_Housebook%22_reported_sold_in_Germany

If anyone can add some details: it's a wiki.

In this weblog see
http://archiv.twoday.net/topics/Kulturgut/
passim (German news on the Housebook case).


http://www.si.umich.edu/ArchivalMetrics/

Update to: http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/4408109/

http://bibliodyssey.blogspot.com/2008/02/diversions.html
quotes:

"A new website, http://parkerweb.stanford.edu, will eventually include high-resolution images of every page of Corpus Christi's Parker Library [Cambridge University]. The remarkable collection includes 538 manuscripts spanning the sixth to the 16th centuries. [..] The beta version currently online includes about a sixth of the total content that eventually will be available. The project is scheduled for completion in late 2009."

"The beta site will be fully and freely accessible at least through 2008. But once the site's development and content are complete, full access will be available through institutional subscriptions only."

 

twoday.net AGB

xml version of this page

xml version of this topic

powered by Antville powered by Helma