Allgemeines
Architekturarchive
Archivbau
Archivbibliotheken
Archive in der Zukunft
Archive von unten
Archivgeschichte
Archivpaedagogik
Archivrecht
Archivsoftware
Ausbildungsfragen
Bestandserhaltung
Bewertung
Bibliothekswesen
Bildquellen
Datenschutz
... weitere
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren
null

 

English Corner

http://etatsocial.hypotheses.org/610

http://cdm16694.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/landingpage/collection/Grolier01

Asks the New Yorker and features Internet Archives' Wayback Machine:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/01/26/cobweb

Via
http://researchbuzz.me/2015/01/21/big-game-big-archive-more-wednesday-morning-buzz-january-21st-2015/

http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/35/

http://historicalthesaurus.arts.gla.ac.uk/

Via
http://researchbuzz.me/2015/01/16/words-oklahoma-arrl-more-fat-friday-morning-buzz-january-16th-2015/

http://blog.getacclaim.com/25-interesting-observations-about-how-academics-use-twitter/

http://www.understandingcharliehebdo.com/

Update: http://mindthegaps.hypotheses.org/1999


A Sampling of Calendars at the DPLA:

http://bookpatrol.net/happy-new-calendar-a-sampling-of-calendars-at-the-dpla/


Bastian H (2014) A Stronger Post-Publication Culture Is Needed for Better Science. PLoS Med 11(12): e1001772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001772

"These days the system does not keep up well with the speed of activity and the volume of research from a vast community. Articles are, by and large, too uncorrectable and unconnected [5], and much significant intellectual effort is not captured at all. Substantive discussions in journal clubs, in email lists, in social media, and at conferences are not distilled into a concise, permanent, accessible record. Most of the unaddressed content of pre-publication peer review is also lost.

Post-publication evaluation is highly fragmented."

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115253

Abstract

"The emergence of the web has fundamentally affected most aspects of information communication, including scholarly communication. The immediacy that characterizes publishing information to the web, as well as accessing it, allows for a dramatic increase in the speed of dissemination of scholarly knowledge. But, the transition from a paper-based to a web-based scholarly communication system also poses challenges. In this paper, we focus on reference rot, the combination of link rot and content drift to which references to web resources included in Science, Technology, and Medicine (STM) articles are subject. We investigate the extent to which reference rot impacts the ability to revisit the web context that surrounds STM articles some time after their publication. We do so on the basis of a vast collection of articles from three corpora that span publication years 1997 to 2012. For over one million references to web resources extracted from over 3.5 million articles, we determine whether the HTTP URI is still responsive on the live web and whether web archives contain an archived snapshot representative of the state the referenced resource had at the time it was referenced. We observe that the fraction of articles containing references to web resources is growing steadily over time. We find one out of five STM articles suffering from reference rot, meaning it is impossible to revisit the web context that surrounds them some time after their publication. When only considering STM articles that contain references to web resources, this fraction increases to seven out of ten. We suggest that, in order to safeguard the long-term integrity of the web-based scholarly record, robust solutions to combat the reference rot problem are required. In conclusion, we provide a brief insight into the directions that are explored with this regard in the context of the Hiberlink project."


 

twoday.net AGB

xml version of this page

xml version of this topic

powered by Antville powered by Helma