Allgemeines
Architekturarchive
Archivbau
Archivbibliotheken
Archive in der Zukunft
Archive von unten
Archivgeschichte
Archivpaedagogik
Archivrecht
Archivsoftware
Ausbildungsfragen
Bestandserhaltung
Bewertung
Bibliothekswesen
Bildquellen
Datenschutz
... weitere
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren
null

 

English Corner

* The leading LIS journal in Germany, Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie (ZfBB), published 24 articles in 2008. Klaus Graf found that two years later, only one article is free online and it's not the version of record and not libre OA.
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/6400333/


http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/07-02-10.htm

To clarify: I only counted the category "Aufsätze" (articles) not reports, reviews, etc.

http://www.researchbuzz.org/r/?p=2127

http://www.londonlives.org/

http://openedweb.com/blog/2010/06/24/rethinking-cc-licensing/

See also
http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/OER_Open_Educational_Resources_and_Higher_Education.pdf

http://booksearch.blogspot.com/2010/06/google-releases-500-scans-of-ancient.html

http://www.google.com/googlebooks/ancient-greek-and-latin.html

"(CNN) -- One of South America's largest historical archives -- 35 million pages that chronicle widespread killing, forced disappearances and torture committed by Brazilian military rulers from 1964 to 1985 -- is rotting away in an obscure government building in Brazil's capital."

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/06/27/brazil.documents

The proportion of peer reviewed scholarly journal articles, which are available openly in full text on the web, was studied using a random sample of 1837 titles and a web search engine. Of articles published in 2008, 8.5% were freely available at the publishers' sites. For an additional 11.9% free manuscript versions could be found using search engines, making the overall OA percentage 20.4%.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273


Is this too bizarre to be in the National Archives? Add a cap... on Twitpic (Click to enlarge!)

We here at Prologue’s Pieces of History understand that history can be a very solemn study. Understanding past conflicts and pouring over the details of a battle, while exhilarating, can also be a trying, somber process.

But for all the wars and historic events that are cataloged in the National Archives, one thing is true: they often result in really funny photos, especially when pulled out of context.

And that’s why we want all you hard-working researchers and history aficionados to take a quick break and exercise your funny bone. We’ve compiled a growing number of awkward, strange, silly, and downright weird still images from our collection, and we’d like you to come up with funny captions for them.

Post your captions in the comment box below, and then our expert panel of judges (with occasional special guest judges) will announce who won the contest when we post a new photo next Thursday. Every winner will get 30% off a one-time purchase from the National Archives e-Store, too.

UPDATE: Our first guest judge is the Archivist, David S. Ferriero!


Link

http://opuscula.synergiesprairies.ca/ojs/index.php/opuscula

Opuscula: Short Texts of the Middle Ages and Renaissance is a peer-reviewed, on-line journal/text series published by Classical, Medieval and Renaissance Studies at the University of Saskatchewan, specializing in short texts of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. We seek single-witness editions of a broad range of pre-modern texts including but not limited to literary and philosophical works, letters, charters, court documents, and notebooks.

The goal of the journal is to establish open access to a substantial body of small but complete texts in scholarly editions to researchers and educators. Our first issue will be published in 2011.

http://rechtsgeschiedenis.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/beyond-the-lines-of-soccer/

About 40 Wikipedia contributors in the London area spent Friday with a “backstage pass” to the museum, meeting with curators and taking photographs of the collection. And in a curious reversal in status, curators were invited to review Wikipedia’s treatment of the museum’s collection and make a case that important pieces were missing or given short shrift.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/05/arts/design/05wiki.html

 

twoday.net AGB

xml version of this page

xml version of this topic

powered by Antville powered by Helma